X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [64.117.224.130]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25E11D1C4E1 for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2003 17:23:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([64.117.224.193]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [64.117.224.130]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29918-08 for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2003 14:21:57 -0300 (ADT) Received: from calma.pair.com (calma.pair.com [209.68.1.95]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1D580D1C4BD for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2003 14:23:02 -0300 (ADT) Received: (qmail 36518 invoked by uid 3059); 4 Aug 2003 17:23:02 -0000 Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 13:23:02 -0400 From: "Chad N. Tindel" To: Josh Berkus Cc: Ian Barwick , "Chad N. Tindel" , Roberto Mello , pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Mysql -> Postgresql pitfalls Message-ID: <20030804172302.GA36172@calma.pair.com> References: <20030801163555.GA32496@calma.pair.com> <20030802171049.GB12300@calma.pair.com> <200308032019.57545.barwick@gmx.net> <200308040929.13270.josh@agliodbs.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200308040929.13270.josh@agliodbs.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200308/27 X-Sequence-Number: 1887 > Are we actually arguing about whether or not Postmaster should be allowed to > run as root? > > I thought this question was settled, like, 5 years ago. I don't think my responses have been being posted to the list... they're probably all blocked pending approval of some administrator. No, I'm not arguing to allow postmaster to run as root. Chad