X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [64.117.224.130])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C88ACD1B8CE
	for <pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 20 Aug 2003 23:33:02 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([64.117.224.193])
	by localhost (neptune.hub.org [64.117.224.130]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024) with ESMTP id 09343-03
	for <pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 20 Aug 2003 23:32:56 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from wolff.to (wolff.to [66.93.249.74])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E44FAD1BB51
	for <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>; Wed, 20 Aug 2003 23:32:51 -0300 (ADT)
Received: (qmail 26412 invoked by uid 500); 21 Aug 2003 02:38:43 -0000
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 21:38:43 -0500
From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Time input documentation error
Message-ID: <20030821023843.GB24904@wolff.to>
Mail-Followup-To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
	pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
References: <20030820134307.GA6891@wolff.to> <18233.1061411086@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <18233.1061411086@sss.pgh.pa.us>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org
X-Archive-Number: 200308/62
X-Sequence-Number: 1922

On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 16:24:46 -0400,
  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> 
> I'm inclined to say this is a code bug not a doc bug.

Do I have to do anything more to get it listed as a bug or can I consider
the proper people as having been notified?