X-Original-To: pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D50AD1B57B for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 18:32:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 66942-03 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 15:31:48 -0300 (ADT) Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (momjian.navpoint.com [207.106.42.251]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CB28D1B56A for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 15:31:44 -0300 (ADT) Received: (from pgman@localhost) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h9MIVbu08292; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 14:31:37 -0400 (EDT) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <200310221831.h9MIVbu08292@candle.pha.pa.us> Subject: Re: 7.4 compatibility question In-Reply-To: <1066847216.374.108.camel@tokyo> To: Neil Conway Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 14:31:37 -0400 (EDT) Cc: Tom Lane , Christopher Kings-Lynne , PostgreSQL Hackers X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL108 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200310/1049 X-Sequence-Number: 45731 Neil Conway wrote: > On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 13:26, Tom Lane wrote: > > We do already have a practice of adding notes about significant changes > > to release.sgml as they are made. That's relatively new though, and I > > dunno if it's helped Bruce prepare the finished release notes or not. > > Right, we also did a pretty bad job of incrementally updating > release.sgml during the development cycle: only a small portion of all > the changes that we made actually got added to it. I think it would be a > good idea to try to be better at this during the 7.5 cycle. When 7.5 > development begins, we should divide release.sgml into the relevant > sections (e.g. "libpq", "contrib", "performance", "highlights of the > release", etc.), and then keep it updated whenever a relevant change is > made. > > IMHO that would be bother easier to maintain (see we need to write CVS > changelog entries anyway, and Bruce wouldn't need to spend as long > summarizing the changes at the end of the dev cycle), as well as > producing a better quality release notes -- but since Bruce is the one > actually doing the work, I'm content to leave this in his hands. I find it easier to generate a list from raw CVS than to merge +500 entries into a consistent whole, and I never expect the maintained list to be 100% accurate, so I have to do the CVS thing anyway. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073