Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 10:31:08 -0700
From: Roberto Mello <rmello@cc.usu.edu>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: Michael Glaesemann <grzm@myrealbox.com>,
	pgsql-www@postgresql.org, pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [DOCS] 7.4 official docs : Fonts?
Message-ID: <20031120173107.GA3050@cc.usu.edu>
References: <BFF909A2-1B79-11D8-8C54-0005029FC1A7@myrealbox.com>
	<200311201716.hAKHGwd04849@candle.pha.pa.us>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200311201716.hAKHGwd04849@candle.pha.pa.us>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i

On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 12:16:58PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Michael Glaesemann wrote:
> > When I was experimenting with different color schemes, I thought about 
> > perhaps matching the syntax coloring of my editor, BBEdit. However, I'm 
> > sure not all editors use the same color scheme (the ANSI SQL language 
> > module for BBEdit displays only blue (keywords), pink (strings), and 
> > black (everything else). The blue would conflict with the current link 
> > color, and I'd rather not use pink unless everyone else thinks it's a 
> > good idea.) I'm interested in hearing what editors others use for 
> > coding, and what syntax coloring schemes they use for SQL.

I use vim, it has good SQL coloring syntax. The one problem that I'd like
to fix in it is that the body of PL/pgSQL functions are shown as a big
string.

-Roberto

-- 
+----|        Roberto Mello   -    http://www.brasileiro.net/  |------+
+       Computer Science Graduate Student, Utah State University      +
+       USU Free Software & GNU/Linux Club - http://fslc.usu.edu/     +
YES!!  eh, NO!!! oh, well  MAYBE!!!!!!!!