public inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Sean Chittenden <[email protected]>
To: Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: xsltproc very slow
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 15:19:36 -0800
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>

> I've just tried out how xsltproc (1.0.8) performs compared to
> openjade (1.3.1).  I'm not impressed.  While openjade is already
> notoriously slow, 12 minutes for a full documentation build on my
> system, with xsltproc it took 55 minutes.  Can anyone try it out on
> his system to see whether other versions or other configurations
> perform better?  As it stands, I'm not excited to give up openjade.

Profile xsltproc(1).  Dime to dollar it's some inefficient XSL.
libxslt is by and large considered the fastest XSL processor and is
very performance consciouus.  I wrote the ruby bindings for
libxml/libxslt and have found Daniel very responsive to performance
related questions.  $0.02.  If you find some problem XSL that's slow,
let me know and I may be able to help out.  -sc

-- 
Sean Chittenden

view thread (2+ messages)

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: xsltproc very slow
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox