From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Message-Id: <200312180015.hBI0FCA26136@candle.pha.pa.us>
Subject: Re: My SGML build fixed
In-Reply-To: <200312180102.50115.peter_e@gmx.net>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 19:15:12 -0500 (EST)
Cc: PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > My 5-minute SGML build is now working again.  The URL's are at
> > > > the bottom of the developers page.
> > >
> > > Why do we need two builds anyway?
> >
> > Good question --- historically, the SGML build on postgresql.org  was
> > often broken, sometimes for months, and the build isn't frequent
> > enough for someone to commit an SGML change, then quickly view a new
> > build to see if errors were introduced.
> 
> All of this has obviously not been true for a long time, so I repeat my 
> question.

How often does the postgresql.org site build the SGML files?  And just
last week the News build failed because it lost execution bits.  I still
don't trust dynamic content on postgresql.org to work reliably.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073