X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 521DFD1B4B0
	for <pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Thu, 18 Dec 2003 16:56:04 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 48706-04
	for <pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Thu, 18 Dec 2003 12:55:14 -0400 (AST)
Received: from curie.credativ.org (credativ.com [217.160.209.18])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AC56D1B49B
	for <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 12:55:14 -0400 (AST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by curie.credativ.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D682756243; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 17:54:56 +0100 (CET)
Received: from 192.168.2.126 (dsl-082-082-168-134.arcor-ip.net
 [82.82.168.134])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by curie.credativ.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 689DA5623C; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 17:54:56 +0100 (CET)
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Subject: Re: My SGML build fixed
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 17:54:54 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4
Cc: pgman@candle.pha.pa.us, pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
References: <200312180102.50115.peter_e@gmx.net>
	<35406.137.226.116.82.1071738232.squirrel@new.host.name>
	<19493.1071759098@sss.pgh.pa.us>
In-Reply-To: <19493.1071759098@sss.pgh.pa.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200312181754.54502.peter_e@gmx.net>
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS at credativ.com
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org
X-Archive-Number: 200312/49
X-Sequence-Number: 2209

Tom Lane wrote:
> "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > Right now it just seems like a waste of resources and it confuses
> > the onlookers.
>
> If Bruce is willing to expend the resources, what's the problem?
> I kinda like having some redundancy in this service, myself.

Bruce said he does it because postgresql.org is regularly broken.  To 
that I say, fix it.  If he says he does it out of joy, then I don't 
care.

However, maybe we should structure the developer website listing 
differently, such as

Development version of the documentation
* Mirror 0
* Mirror 1

so onlookers see that they are two more or less identical versions of 
the same service.