X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F53AD1BAE9
	for <pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Tue,  9 Mar 2004 17:43:02 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 08242-01
	for <pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Tue,  9 Mar 2004 13:42:54 -0400 (AST)
Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (candle.pha.pa.us [207.106.42.251])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC10AD1BA93
	for <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>; Tue,  9 Mar 2004 13:42:51 -0400 (AST)
Received: (from pgman@localhost)
	by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.11.6) id i29HgkF23170;
	Tue, 9 Mar 2004 12:42:46 -0500 (EST)
From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Message-Id: <200403091742.i29HgkF23170@candle.pha.pa.us>
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server/doc/src/sgml Makefile
In-Reply-To: <25307.1078845873@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 12:42:46 -0500 (EST)
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>,
	PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL108 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org
X-Archive-Number: 200403/19
X-Sequence-Number: 2309

Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> CONTENT="Modular DocBook HTML Stylesheet Version 1.59"></HEAD
> 
> > This qualifies as ancient.  Newer versions are available from
> > http://docbook.sourceforge.net/projects/dsssl/index.html
> 
> Okay.  I see that both postgresql.org and Bruce are generating the docs
> with
> 	Modular DocBook HTML Stylesheet Version 1.7
> Shall we standardize on that and lynx 2.8.5 as the current "official"
> versions to use for building the docs?

2.8.5 is a development release of lynx, not a stable one:

	Lynx Version 2.8.5dev.16 (01 Jun 2003)

Do we want to standardize on a development version of some tools?  It is
only converting to text, so I guess it is OK.

I downloaded the version of lynx Tom has just so I can generate the
newer output.  The only difference between my 2.8.3 lynx and 2.8.5 is
that 2.8.5 trips spaces on blank lines used between headings, which is
good.

I have also rebuilt the HISTORY file in CVS to match our official style
sheets.

> Also, I'm running openjade 1.3 on this machine, and as I recall it was
> a serious pain in the arse to build.  Is it worth worrying about a newer
> version of that?

I can help you because I just installed new tools a few months ago. I
will phone you.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073