X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3813BD1D2BC; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:03:49 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 83054-08; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 11:03:47 -0400 (AST)
Received: from curie.credativ.org (credativ.com [217.160.209.18])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E69ECD1B445; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 11:03:42 -0400 (AST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by curie.credativ.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6F64355F01; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 16:03:46 +0100 (CET)
Received: from colt.pezone.net (dsl-213-023-254-012.arcor-ip.net
	[213.23.254.12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by curie.credativ.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D6C2555BEB; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 16:03:45 +0100 (CET)
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server/doc/src/sgml Makefile
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 16:03:45 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1
Cc: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>,
	Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
	PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
References: <200403091853.i29IrgE04192@candle.pha.pa.us>
	<200403092046.12854.peter_e@gmx.net>
	<20040309160559.B50574@ganymede.hub.org>
In-Reply-To: <20040309160559.B50574@ganymede.hub.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200403111603.45442.peter_e@gmx.net>
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS at credativ.com
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org
X-Archive-Number: 200403/43
X-Sequence-Number: 2333

Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> Definitely open to suggestions on changing it ... I'm down to:

The reason this is all so complicated in the first place is that in the 
past we wanted to defend ourselves against broken documentation sources 
when building snapshots.  As of now this doesn't work anymore, so we 
might as well automate the whole process including the documentation 
build and be done with these games.  Comments?