From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Message-Id: <200404150533.i3F5Xf925692@candle.pha.pa.us>
Subject: Re: Clarification of DateStyle
In-Reply-To: <12432.1082006859@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 01:33:41 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > I have applied the following patch to clarify the meaning of the second
> > DateStyle field.
> 
> Am I seeing correctly that this is actually just a one-word insertion?
> You do your readers no favor by providing patches for comment that
> consist largely of content-free rearrangement of line breaks.

Yea, confusing.  The change was from:

	and the date field order specification 

to:

        and the input/output specification for year/month/day ordering

When I am in there, I take the opportunity to clean up the arrangement. 
If I don't my new text pushes everything out of alignment.

I guess I could make the changes, do a diff, then reformat before
applying to CVS.  Would that help?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073