X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F175DD1B518 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 09:37:08 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 40719-08 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 09:37:09 -0300 (ADT) Received: from curie.credativ.org (credativ.com [217.160.209.18]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38FACD1DC2B for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 09:37:06 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by curie.credativ.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41CE756393; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 14:37:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from www.credativ.de (pD95F9C49.dip.t-dialin.net [217.95.156.73]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by curie.credativ.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C47B056392; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 14:37:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from farnsworth.credativ.de (farnsworth.credativ.de [172.26.14.18]) by www.credativ.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C77B1C0086; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 14:37:00 +0200 (CEST) From: Peter Eisentraut To: josh@agliodbs.com Subject: Re: Fwd: PostgreSQL 7.4 documentation packaging Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 14:36:59 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org References: <200404191518.19125.josh@agliodbs.com> In-Reply-To: <200404191518.19125.josh@agliodbs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200404211436.59292.peter_e@gmx.net> X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS at credativ.com X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200404/22 X-Sequence-Number: 2366 Am Dienstag, 20. April 2004 00:18 schrieb Josh Berkus: > Just got this request from Mark Recht, who maintains an RPM package library > at www.pkgsrc.org. It seems that we don't have an option for compile for > our docs which is standard with other Linux tools. How difficult would > this be to add? It would help Mark keep our packages updated. pkgsrc is a NetBSD package library, not an RPM library. We do have a target to "compile" the documentation, which is how the documentation is built in the first place. I don't know what "standard" there is about that.