public inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
To: PostgreSQL-general <[email protected]>
To: PostgreSQL-documentation <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Do we need more emphasis on backup?
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2004 15:09:17 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)

pgman wrote:
> Jim Seymour wrote:
> > Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > 
> > [snip]
> > > 
> > > We do need to point out that you're only as reliable as your last
> > > backup.  I'm not sure exactly where to say this.
> > [snip]
> > > 
> > 
> > Hmph.  Backups are for mitigation against a catastrophic failure
> > destroying or corrupting main storage.  And even then: Subtle errors
> > can induce data corruption that may go un-noticed until it's too late.
> > (I.e.:  The last correct backups have been over-written, retired, so
> > old they've become unreadable, so old the data's no longer useful,
> > etc.)
> > 
> > My position is that your data is only as reliable as your hardware,
> > period.  Use cheap (usually PC, sorry) hardware and, well...  I wonder
> > how many people are aware of the fact that the cheaper PCs don't even
> > have parity memory anymore?  Then there are the issues with IDE
> > drives.  (Don't recall those, exactly - don't use 'em.)
> 
> There is a basic misconception that all PC hardware is created equal ---
> that hard drives, mother boards, and RAM are all the same because they
> are all PC-compatible.  Compatible != Similar Quality.
> 
> Not sure where we would document this.  :-(
> 
> Running BSD, I have always had to buy server-class hardware for my home
> machines, and I never regretted it nor had a problem.

Should I add an FAQ discussing hardware selection and the importance of
reliable hardware?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [email protected]               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073



view thread (22+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Do we need more emphasis on backup?
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox