X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A166D1B281 for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 19:01:26 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03317-04 for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 22:01:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 96865D1B241 for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 19:01:22 -0300 (ADT) Received: (qmail 9542 invoked by uid 65534); 6 Jul 2004 22:01:25 -0000 Received: from dsl-082-082-234-017.arcor-ip.net (EHLO colt.pezone.net) (82.82.234.17) by mail.gmx.net (mp024) with SMTP; 07 Jul 2004 00:01:25 +0200 X-Authenticated: #495269 From: Peter Eisentraut To: Bruce Momjian , PostgreSQL-general , PostgreSQL-documentation Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Do we need more emphasis on backup? Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 00:01:24 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1 References: <200407051909.i65J9Hu04344@candle.pha.pa.us> In-Reply-To: <200407051909.i65J9Hu04344@candle.pha.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200407070001.24362.peter_e@gmx.net> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200407/9 X-Sequence-Number: 2417 Bruce Momjian wrote: > Should I add an FAQ discussing hardware selection and the importance > of reliable hardware? I'm not a fan of having N "FAQs" for N topics. Just put it into the documentation.