X-Original-To: pgsql-general-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C06CBD1B181
	for <pgsql-general-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Mon, 12 Jul 2004 02:13:00 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 22710-05
	for <pgsql-general-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Mon, 12 Jul 2004 05:13:02 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from proxy.ddcom.co.jp (proxy.ddcom.co.jp [211.121.191.163])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EEEA4D1B1D0
	for <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>;
	Mon, 12 Jul 2004 02:12:51 -0300 (ADT)
Received: (qmail 31232 invoked by alias); 12 Jul 2004 05:12:12 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO matthew) (10.10.10.11)
	by mail.ddcom.local with SMTP; 12 Jul 2004 05:12:12 -0000
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 14:12:57 +0900
From: Joel <rees@ddcom.co.jp>
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Do we need more emphasis on backup?
In-Reply-To: <200407120359.i6C3xqs04304@candle.pha.pa.us>
References: <20040712114448.3AD9.REES@ddcom.co.jp>
	<200407120359.i6C3xqs04304@candle.pha.pa.us>
Message-Id: <20040712140533.E2BB.REES@ddcom.co.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.00.06
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200407/394
X-Sequence-Number: 62993

> New text:
> 
>     <P>Because PC hardware is mostly compatible, people tend to believe that
>     all PC hardware is of equal quality.  It is not.  ECC RAM, SCSI, and
>     quality motherboards are more reliable and have better performance than
>     less expensive hardware.  PostgreSQL will run on almost any hardware,
>     but if reliability and performance are important it is wise to
>     research your hardware options thoroughly.  Our email lists can be used
>     to discuss hardware options and tradeoffs.</P>

I like that, too.

(And now, after a break with real-world grammars, back to the cold,
cruel world of mechanical parsers. ;)

-- 
Joel <rees@ddcom.co.jp>