X-Original-To: pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E548D1B23E for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 20:22:59 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02933-10 for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 23:22:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0CE1CD1B16A for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 20:22:48 -0300 (ADT) Received: (qmail 5643 invoked by uid 65534); 22 Jul 2004 23:22:51 -0000 Received: from dsl-213-023-255-213.arcor-ip.net (EHLO colt.pezone.net) (213.23.255.213) by mail.gmx.net (mp001) with SMTP; 23 Jul 2004 01:22:51 +0200 X-Authenticated: #495269 From: Peter Eisentraut To: David Fetter , PG Hackers Subject: Re: Tutorial Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 01:22:49 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1 References: <20040722222104.GU7751@fetter.org> In-Reply-To: <20040722222104.GU7751@fetter.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200407230122.49197.peter_e@gmx.net> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200407/1121 X-Sequence-Number: 56682 David Fetter wrote: > What do you all think? Please discuss these matters on the pgsql-docs list. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/