X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D4B1D1B1AA; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 01:25:44 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 43948-07; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 04:25:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (candle.pha.pa.us [207.106.42.251]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D84CBD1B18A; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 01:25:35 -0300 (ADT) Received: (from pgman@localhost) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.11.6) id i6P4PhI29389; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 00:25:43 -0400 (EDT) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <200407250425.i6P4PhI29389@candle.pha.pa.us> Subject: 7.5 release notes To: PostgreSQL-development Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 00:25:43 -0400 (EDT) Cc: PostgreSQL-documentation X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL108 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200407/31 X-Sequence-Number: 2439 I have completed the 7.5 release notes. You can view them in HTML on the developer web page. I have marked a few items with question marks that need to be addressed. I am looking for improvements, even minor ones. Either send in a patch or committers can modify the file directly. Of course this file will be updated regularly all the way up to final release to it isn't in its final form. We don't have a /HISTORY file anymore so you have to view it via HTML. /HISTORY will be in the final tarball, however. Do people want a big-picture paragraph at the top talking about the release? Some releases get them, some don't, but this one could if folks want it. FYI, I have a NYC meeting on Monday so I am not going to OSCON until Tuesday so I will be around regularly for 2-3 more days. One thing we now need to look at is missing documentation. The release notes usually make missing documentation very glaring and I think we need to work up a list of what is missing. There isn't that much missing except for the features we just finalized and stuff put in during the past month of push to beta. I am thinking of marking the items needing docs right in the release notes with [DOCS] and that way everyone can see what is needed. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073