public inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: David Fetter <[email protected]>
To: Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
Cc: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Cc: Jeff <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Suggestion on reorganizing functions
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 14:27:37 -0700
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>

On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 11:20:33PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > I am not sure if DocBook could handle generating an index covering
> > just functions, or if we'd have to merge it with the general
> > index.
> 
> I think it's possible -- with a bit of programming work.  I doubt,
> however, that it's going to be all that useful.  We're already
> having trouble categorizing things like IS NULL (function?,
> operator?, special construct?).

For docs, redundancy is fine, at least at the output level :)

> A function index would be quite unreliable ("It's not in the
> function index, so it's not supported.").  Feel free to add general
> index entries for all functions, though.

Where?

Cheers,
D
-- 
David Fetter [email protected] http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 510 893 6100   mobile: +1 415 235 3778

Remember to vote!

view thread (10+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: Suggestion on reorganizing functions
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox