X-Original-To: pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22DD85E46CF for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 01:03:56 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21114-09 for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 04:04:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (candle.pha.pa.us [207.106.42.251]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B48E5E46DA for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 01:03:51 -0300 (ADT) Received: (from pgman@localhost) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.11.6) id i7D43tv13820; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 00:03:55 -0400 (EDT) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <200408130403.i7D43tv13820@candle.pha.pa.us> Subject: Re: 8.0 beta status In-Reply-To: <25964.1091850874@sss.pgh.pa.us> To: Tom Lane Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 00:03:55 -0400 (EDT) Cc: Christopher Kings-Lynne , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL108 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200408/758 X-Sequence-Number: 57727 Where are we on this? --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tom Lane wrote: > Christopher Kings-Lynne writes: > >> Yeah, those are all bug fixes and okay for post-beta I think. But which > >> two tablespace failures are you thinking of exactly? The last couple > >> weeks have been a bit of a blur for me... > > > http://groups.google.com.au/groups?q=tablespaces+group:comp.databases.postgresql.hackers&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&group=comp.databases.postgresql.hackers&scoring=d&selm=Pine.LNX.4.58.0407281411470.17889%40linuxworld.com.au&rnum=4 > > Okay, this is a the-error-message-could-be-better gripe. Fair enough, > but it's not top of my priority list ... > > > http://groups.google.com.au/groups?q=tablespaces+group:comp.databases.postgresql.hackers&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&group=comp.databases.postgresql.hackers&scoring=d&selm=4107211C.2050508%40familyhealth.com.au&rnum=5 > > I think the problem here is that we don't have a syntax for saying > "my tablespace is the same as my database's default tablespace" or "my > tablespace is the same as my schema's default tablespace", when there is > an intermediate object (schema or table) that isn't using that > tablespace. (Note that "TABLESPACE pg_default" does definitely not mean > either of these.) > > This is fixable with some special syntax but is it worth the trouble? > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org > -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073