X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C39F329E3D for ; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 00:47:22 +0100 (BST) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 40962-08 for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 23:47:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mr2.surnet.cl (av2.surnet.cl [216.155.73.169]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA4B6329C67 for ; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 00:47:11 +0100 (BST) Received: from smtp2.surnet.cl (216.155.73.169) by mr2.surnet.cl (7.0.024) id 413E2E550005C5F1; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 19:44:52 -0400 Received: from av1.surnet.cl ([216.155.73.168]) by smtp2.surnet.cl (MailMonitor for SMTP v1.2.2 ) ; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 19:44:52 -0400 (CLT) Received: from cluster.surnet.cl (216.155.73.165) by smtp1.surnet.cl (7.0.024) id 413F2C34000339DC; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 19:47:00 -0400 Received: from 216.155.88.75.dsl.surnet.cl (200.85.219.231) by cluster.surnet.cl (7.0.024) (authenticated as alvherre@surnet.cl) id 4134D3220010E790; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 19:47:04 -0400 Received: by 216.155.88.75.dsl.surnet.cl (Postfix, from userid 500) id ABA647D8B; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 19:47:28 -0400 (CLT) Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 19:47:28 -0400 From: Alvaro Herrera To: Neil Conway Cc: "Thomas F.O'Connell" , pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Minor Typo in SELECT docs Message-ID: <20040909234728.GA7082@dcc.uchile.cl> References: <21EDB02E-01DF-11D9-B9D0-000D93AE0944@sitening.com> <4140E7BD.5090001@samurai.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4140E7BD.5090001@samurai.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200409/10 X-Sequence-Number: 2529 On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 09:31:09AM +1000, Neil Conway wrote: > Thomas F.O'Connell wrote: > >There is a reference to the "sql_interitance" configuration in the 7.4.x > >docs: > > Since it's fixed in HEAD, I think we're fine -- we usually don't bother > applying documentation fixes to release branches, even if there were > plans for another 7.4.x release. Oh, is this really a good policy? -- Alvaro Herrera () "I personally became interested in Linux while I was dating an English major who wouldn't know an operating system if it walked up and bit him." (Val Henson)