X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 788F5329C7B for ; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 15:53:40 +0100 (BST) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 98541-10 for ; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 14:53:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 05E84329C67 for ; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 15:53:32 +0100 (BST) Received: (qmail 9614 invoked by uid 65534); 10 Sep 2004 14:53:31 -0000 Received: from dsl-082-082-224-211.arcor-ip.net (EHLO colt.pezone.net) (82.82.224.211) by mail.gmx.net (mp018) with SMTP; 10 Sep 2004 16:53:31 +0200 X-Authenticated: #495269 From: Peter Eisentraut To: Robert Treat Subject: Re: Minor Typo in SELECT docs Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 16:53:30 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1 Cc: Neil Conway , "Thomas F.O'Connell" , pgsql-docs@postgresql.org References: <21EDB02E-01DF-11D9-B9D0-000D93AE0944@sitening.com> <200409101056.56998.peter_e@gmx.net> <200409100856.55313.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> In-Reply-To: <200409100856.55313.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200409101653.30653.peter_e@gmx.net> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200409/16 X-Sequence-Number: 2535 Robert Treat wrote: > On Friday 10 September 2004 04:56, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > Neil Conway wrote: > > > Thomas F.O'Connell wrote: > > > > There is a reference to the "sql_interitance" configuration in > > > > the 7.4.x docs: > > > > > > Since it's fixed in HEAD, I think we're fine -- we usually don't > > > bother applying documentation fixes to release branches, even if > > > there were plans for another 7.4.x release. > > > > I was under the impression that we usually do. Time permitting, of > > course. > > Well, we've certainly been getting drilled to regenerate the idocs on > the website with each new release in the 7.4.x series. Yes, that was me among others, exactly because of the above. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/