X-Original-To: pgsql-admin-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 494A0329D30; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 21:50:22 +0100 (BST) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 81663-07; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 20:50:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lakermmtao06.cox.net (lakermmtao06.cox.net [68.230.240.33]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35C53329CF7; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 21:50:19 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.0.8] (really [68.101.78.176]) by lakermmtao06.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.04 201-2131-111-106-20040729) with ESMTP id <20040921205017.BVNU10869.lakermmtao06.cox.net@[192.168.0.8]>; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 16:50:17 -0400 From: Robert Treat To: "Magnus Hagander" Subject: Re: windows docs? Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 16:47:32 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 Cc: "Dave Page" , , References: <6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE475D13@algol.sollentuna.se> In-Reply-To: <6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE475D13@algol.sollentuna.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200409211647.32673.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200409/194 X-Sequence-Number: 14897 On Tuesday 21 September 2004 07:59, Magnus Hagander wrote: > > > I guess another alternative is jut remove faq_mswin from the main > > > sources and then leave it up to cygwin/native projects to maintain > > > thier own faqs, with perhaps a single question in the main > > > > postgresql > > > > > pointing to both of the other faqs... anyone have a preference? > > > > The problem with our new FAQ is that much of it is installer > > specific, so including it in the main distro which doesn't > > include the installer code just seems wrong somehow. Perhaps > > the existing faq should have a note in bold at the top > > directing ppl to the installer FAQ if that's what they really > > want, and leave the rest of the doc for Cygwin/Mingw specific issues. > > It would be really good if we had a one-stop-shop for FAQ items for > Windows users, though... Look at the installer faq now for example - a > lot of those Qs are about postgreqsl itself and not the installer. But > that's where people look (or in the main FAQ, but not in both). Or we > can chose to live with duplicate questions... As long as we keep the > answers in sync. > Well, istm that the # of native users will grow larger than the number of cygwin users at some point in time (probably right after release, but hey). Personally I like the idea of a single win32 faq for the main branch with specific links to both a cygwin and native specific faqs, but barring that, we could combine both documents together and make a 3 sectioned windows specific faq, with a section on general stuff, cygwiun stuff, and native stuff. Both projects could then just link to that faq. -- Robert Treat Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL