Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 09:07:12 -0700
From: elein <elein@varlena.com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: elein <elein@varlena.com>, pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: SQL 2003 conformance
Message-ID: <20041014090712.J14574@cookie.varlena.com>
Mail-Followup-To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>,
 pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
References: <200410121952.24859.peter_e@gmx.net>
	<20041013172902.H14574@cookie.varlena.com>
	<200410140914.14097.peter_e@gmx.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200410140914.14097.peter_e@gmx.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i

What I've got is how the new SQL2003 features 
work with Postgres (or not).  This is based on
the paper that Alvaro suggested later in this thread.
The information is helpful in reviewing
postgres' conformance list.  

Anyway, Troels, ping me on IRC.

--elein


On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 09:14:13AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> elein wrote:
> > I have a couple of the new features written up, but nothing
> > like an entire review.  If someone can tackle this job
> > and wants help, I'll help (but I cannot sign up for the
> > whole thing).  Or if someone wants the material
> > on the items I have done, just email me.
> 
> I was not asking for a review of the new features, I was talking about 
> reviewing (revising, updating, ...) the existing SQL conformance 
> feature list in the documentation.
> 
> -- 
> Peter Eisentraut
> http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/