public inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
To: Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
Cc: Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>
Cc: Troels Arvin <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Some developer FAQ links need updating
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 12:10:11 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>


OK, new wording:

    <P>There are three versions of the SQL standard:  SQL-92, SQL:1999,
    and SQL:2003.  They are endorsed by ANSI and ISO.  Draft versions
    can be download from:


---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Am Freitag, 15. Oktober 2004 05:24 schrieb Bruce Momjian:
> > I don't think so.  Some database say they are SQL99-compliant while not
> > SQL-2003 compliant.
> 
> Clearly, consenting parties are free to agree on making their products conform 
> to any standards document, be it old or new or deprecated or silly.  In the 
> same way, someone could make a product that is certified for PostgreSQL 
> 7.2.1.  Or someone could write an HTML-compliant browser, only that it might 
> be HTML 3.2.
> 
> Since we have limited resources, I think it's OK that we concentrate on 
> working with the latest official standards version.  And because the latest 
> standards version is modularized and has individual feature lists and 
> packages, it would be a lot easier for us to look good, and it would be more 
> useful for users to, say, specify a workable set of requirements for their 
> applications.
> 
> Nevertheless, it would surely be useful to list SQL92 and SQL99 as older 
> versions, just like many people still code to HTML 4.01 instead of XHTML 1.1, 
> and just like many people still use PostgreSQL 7.2.1, inspite of it not 
> conforming to any standard, as far as I know.
> 
> -- 
> Peter Eisentraut
> http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> 
>                http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
> 

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [email protected]               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073



view thread (13+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: Some developer FAQ links need updating
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox