X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD6D23A3C44 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 07:28:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 42806-01 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 07:28:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 398633A3C9A for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 07:28:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: (qmail 9528 invoked by uid 65534); 23 Nov 2004 07:28:09 -0000 Received: from dsl-082-082-229-077.arcor-ip.net (EHLO localhost) (82.82.229.77) by mail.gmx.net (mp016) with SMTP; 23 Nov 2004 08:28:09 +0100 X-Authenticated: #495269 From: Peter Eisentraut To: esr@thyrsus.com Subject: Re: problems in vacuumdb.1 Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 08:28:01 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org References: <200411210402.iAL42VuP014411@snark.thyrsus.com> In-Reply-To: <200411210402.iAL42VuP014411@snark.thyrsus.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200411230828.01426.peter_e@gmx.net> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200411/50 X-Sequence-Number: 2685 esr@thyrsus.com wrote: > Problems with vacuumdb.1: > > 1. Broken command synopsis syntax. This may mean you're using a > construction in the command synopsis other than the standard > [ ] | { }, or it may mean you have running text in the command > synopsis section (the latter is not technically an error, but it's > impossible to translate into DocBook markup). Look at the original DocBook source: vacuumdb connection-option --full-f --verbose-v --analyze-z --table | -t table ( column [,...] ) dbname vacuumdb connection-options --all-a --full-f --verbose-v --analyze-z If you have a suggestion how to mark up the [, ...] then we would welcome it, but I don't think your proposed patch will do it. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/