X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4426D8B9B2C for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 01:08:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 52509-10 for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 01:07:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tigger.fuhr.org (tigger.fuhr.org [63.214.45.158]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A58798BA0A2 for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 01:07:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from winnie.fuhr.org (winnie.fuhr.org [10.1.0.1]) by tigger.fuhr.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j1G17pnr028710 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 15 Feb 2005 18:07:53 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from mfuhr@winnie.fuhr.org) Received: from winnie.fuhr.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by winnie.fuhr.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j1G17p5n013912; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 18:07:51 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from mfuhr@winnie.fuhr.org) Received: (from mfuhr@localhost) by winnie.fuhr.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j1G17oQH013911; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 18:07:50 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from mfuhr) Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 18:07:50 -0700 From: Michael Fuhr To: Peter Eisentraut Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Bibliography updates for new editions? Message-ID: <20050216010750.GB13781@winnie.fuhr.org> References: <20050215022020.GA32064@winnie.fuhr.org> <200502151057.35266.peter_e@gmx.net> <20050215171158.GA44655@winnie.fuhr.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050215171158.GA44655@winnie.fuhr.org> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.003 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200502/48 X-Sequence-Number: 2881 On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 10:11:58AM -0700, Michael Fuhr wrote: > On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 10:57:34AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > Am Dienstag, 15. Februar 2005 03:20 schrieb Michael Fuhr: > > > Should entries in the Bibliography be updated to reflect new editions? > > > > Sure. Please submit a patch. > > Will do. Just wanted to make sure I wouldn't be wasting anybody's > time by doing so. Should I update the biblioentry id's, or are they keys that shouldn't be changed so other documents that refer to them don't need to be updated? For example, should DATE94 remain the same, or should it become DATE04 (or DATE2004)? I see that BOWMAN93 refers to a 1996 edition of that book, so I'm guessing the id's should remain untouched. Just wanted to be sure, though. Thanks. -- Michael Fuhr http://www.fuhr.org/~mfuhr/