X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA34153414 for ; Fri, 6 May 2005 12:42:56 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30865-06 for ; Fri, 6 May 2005 15:42:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sunsite.dcc.uchile.cl (sunsite.dcc.uchile.cl [192.80.24.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2D8852A37 for ; Fri, 6 May 2005 12:42:49 -0300 (ADT) Received: from anakena.dcc.uchile.cl (anakena [192.80.24.6]) by sunsite.dcc.uchile.cl (8.13.4/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j46FgcXQ022207; Fri, 6 May 2005 11:42:38 -0400 (CLT) Received: by anakena.dcc.uchile.cl (Postfix, from userid 4151) id 29DC6523AF; Fri, 6 May 2005 11:42:38 -0400 (CLT) Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 11:42:38 -0400 From: Alvaro Herrera To: Bruce Momjian Cc: Peter Eisentraut , Jeff - , pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: SELinux & Redhat Message-ID: <20050506154238.GF9796@dcc.uchile.cl> References: <200505061713.40511.peter_e@gmx.net> <200505061521.j46FLQI02857@candle.pha.pa.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <200505061521.j46FLQI02857@candle.pha.pa.us> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (sunsite.dcc.uchile.cl [192.80.24.2]); Fri, 06 May 2005 11:42:38 -0400 (CLT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.34 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200505/9 X-Sequence-Number: 2974 On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 11:21:26AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > Am Freitag, 6. Mai 2005 16:55 schrieb Bruce Momjian: > > > A blurb about what? No one else has reported such a problem so we have > > > no reason to assume it isn't a misconfiguration on your end. > > > > *Countless* people are constantly reporting problems that can be attributed to > > selinux. We really need to write something about it. Of course, most > > people, including myself, just solve these issues by turning off selinux, but > > I'd be interested in a more thorough treatment. > > Who makes SE Linux? Is it SuSE? What would we say in an FAQ? I would > rather report something to people using that OS. It's linux-distribution agnostic. Redhat is including it on its distributions, as is Debian. Not sure about the others but that is already a large population. (Of course it's Linux only.) -- Alvaro Herrera () "Aprende a avergonzarte más ante ti que ante los demás" (Demócrito)