X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E7DED880D; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 23:39:24 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 04206-02; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 02:39:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx1.surnet.cl (mx1.surnet.cl [216.155.73.180]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39962D8374; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 23:39:18 -0300 (ADT) Received: from unknown (HELO cluster.surnet.cl) ([216.155.73.165]) by mx1.surnet.cl with ESMTP; 22 Sep 2005 22:40:12 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: i="3.97,114,1125892800"; d="scan'208"; a="10444981:sNHT25031328" Received: from alvh.no-ip.org (216.155.84.209) by cluster.surnet.cl (7.0.043) (authenticated as alvherre@surnet.cl) id 4327E85F000FC919; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 22:39:23 -0400 Received: by alvh.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6E297C37444; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 22:39:35 -0400 (CLT) Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 22:39:35 -0400 From: Alvaro Herrera To: Bruce Momjian Cc: David Fetter , PostgreSQL Docs , PostgreSQL Patches Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Clarifying Autovacuum docs in the release notes Message-ID: <20050923023935.GJ31459@surnet.cl> Mail-Followup-To: Bruce Momjian , David Fetter , PostgreSQL Docs , PostgreSQL Patches References: <20050912033240.GB8194@fetter.org> <200509230225.j8N2PjC21857@candle.pha.pa.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200509230225.j8N2PjC21857@candle.pha.pa.us> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.368 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.408, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE=0.374, DNS_FROM_RFC_POST=1.376, RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY=1.026] X-Spam-Level: ** X-Archive-Number: 200509/33 X-Sequence-Number: 3219 Bruce Momjian wrote: > David Fetter wrote: > > > > Please find attached a patch which tells about what the spiffy, > > integrated autovacuum now does :) > > Patch applied. Thanks. I think somebody has complained in the past that "verb-ification" of command names is not good style, so the " ... and VACUUMs the whole ..." should not be used. Maybe "... and executes VACUUM on the whole ..." is better? -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.amazon.com/gp/registry/CTMLCN8V17R4 FOO MANE PADME HUM