X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D45B6DA5E4 for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 15:21:33 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 46622-07 for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 18:21:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (candle.pha.pa.us [64.139.89.126]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1974DA5E3 for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 15:21:30 -0300 (ADT) Received: (from pgman@localhost) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.11.6) id j9GILVO29383; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 14:21:31 -0400 (EDT) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <200510161821.j9GILVO29383@candle.pha.pa.us> Subject: Re: Will PQregisterThreadLock() be documented? In-Reply-To: <9101.1129485149@sss.pgh.pa.us> To: Tom Lane Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 14:21:31 -0400 (EDT) Cc: Volkan YAZICI , pgsql-docs@postgresql.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.012 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.012] X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200510/48 X-Sequence-Number: 3293 Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> Really? Do we intend applications to call it? > > > Uh, well, we never call it ourselves, so if we don't expect other > > applications to call it, why is it there? > > If it's intended for apps to call, how was the patch initially accepted > with no documentation? Not sure. That's why its history needs to be researched. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073