X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D82519DC9F9 for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 14:40:15 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 97594-03 for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 14:40:14 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from fetter.org (dsl092-188-065.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.92.188.65]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3DC49DCA92 for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 14:40:12 -0400 (AST) Received: by fetter.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id F087BCF1CE; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 10:40:12 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 10:40:12 -0800 From: David Fetter To: "Jim C. Nasby" Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Get docs for contrib on the web somewhere Message-ID: <20060317184012.GA11869@fetter.org> References: <20060308195047.GI45250@pervasive.com> <20060308220544.GA26074@fetter.org> <20060317182244.GE15742@pervasive.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060317182244.GE15742@pervasive.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.128 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.128] X-Spam-Score: 0.128 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200603/16 X-Sequence-Number: 3473 On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 12:22:44PM -0600, Jim C. Nasby wrote: > On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 02:05:44PM -0800, David Fetter wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 01:50:47PM -0600, Jim C. Nasby wrote: > > > It would be nice if there was an easy place to see the documentation > > > for the various contrib projects. Would this be hard to setup? I > > > think the plain text would be fine, just need to post the readme's > > > somewhere and link to them. > > > > http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/contrib/ has at least > > the raw files. I'd be delighted to put up something more, tho :) > > Yeah, but very few people would ever think to look in CVS for > documentation. I think it'd be much better if we could include the > README's in the documentation build process somehow... I'm all for it. Do you have an idea of how this might work? I suppose some kind of idiot conversion of READMEs to man pages might be appropriate. Dunno about what would happen on Windows. Um, help? Cheers, D -- David Fetter http://fetter.org/ phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Skype: davidfetter Remember to vote!