X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B08F9F931D for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 08:40:10 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 46749-08 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 08:40:03 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from mx1.surnet.cl (mx1.surnet.cl [216.155.73.180]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A1D79F946D for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 08:40:04 -0300 (ADT) Received: from unknown (HELO cluster.surnet.cl) ([216.155.73.165]) by mx1.surnet.cl with ESMTP; 09 May 2006 07:40:01 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.05,105,1146456000"; d="scan'208"; a="63291281:sNHT20313072" Received: from alvh.no-ip.org (201.220.122.210) by cluster.surnet.cl (7.0.043) (authenticated as alvherre@surnet.cl) id 443B7DDC003DD420; Tue, 9 May 2006 07:40:01 -0400 Received: by alvh.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 20F3EC31DD0; Tue, 9 May 2006 07:40:01 -0400 (CLT) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 07:40:01 -0400 From: Alvaro Herrera To: Peter Eisentraut Cc: Guillaume Lelarge , pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: French PDF manual Message-ID: <20060509114000.GA9280@surnet.cl> Mail-Followup-To: Peter Eisentraut , Guillaume Lelarge , pgsql-docs@postgresql.org References: <4459A4BC.7060809@gmail.com> <200605090039.45072.peter_e@gmx.net> <200605091150.33894.peter_e@gmx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200605091150.33894.peter_e@gmx.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200605/17 X-Sequence-Number: 3544 Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Am Dienstag, 9. Mai 2006 11:19 schrieb Guillaume Lelarge: > > If someone wants to work on sgml/jade/dsssl stylesheets to fix the > > issues I talked earlier, great, good news. But I haven't seen anyone > > talking about this. So perhaps, the good way to handle this is to go > > the xml way. > > I don't think you got my point. The SGML sources can be converted to XML > automatically. The fact that the XSLT toolchain might work better is no > reason to convert the sources manually. I have a counter-question. What value is there in continuing to use SGML? -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.