X-Original-To: pgsql-patches-postgresql.org@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E7389FB36C for ; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 17:45:11 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28885-03 for ; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 17:45:05 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from tigger.fuhr.org (tigger.fuhr.org [63.214.45.158]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 468D19FB30A for ; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 17:45:04 -0300 (ADT) Received: from winnie.fuhr.org (winnie.fuhr.org [10.1.0.1]) by tigger.fuhr.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id k6VKiu7P024941 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 31 Jul 2006 14:44:59 -0600 (MDT) Received: from winnie.fuhr.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by winnie.fuhr.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k6VKiu4Q067943; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 14:44:56 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from mfuhr@winnie.fuhr.org) Received: (from mfuhr@localhost) by winnie.fuhr.org (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k6VKiuEQ067942; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 14:44:56 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from mfuhr) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 14:44:56 -0600 From: Michael Fuhr To: Tom Lane , Joe Conway , "Patches (PostgreSQL)" Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features? Message-ID: <20060731204456.GA67809@winnie.fuhr.org> References: <200607281947.k6SJlOI02533@momjian.us> <473.1154116455@sss.pgh.pa.us> <44CA76A9.8070101@joeconway.com> <44CB051D.6090609@joeconway.com> <21320.1154222840@sss.pgh.pa.us> <26226.1154279741@sss.pgh.pa.us> <44CE529F.2070701@joeconway.com> <9049.1154373020@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20060731201943.GF20962@alvh.no-ip.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060731201943.GF20962@alvh.no-ip.org> X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.421 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL, SPF_PASS X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200607/353 X-Sequence-Number: 20507 On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 04:19:43PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > Joe Conway writes: > > > The good news is that from a memory and perfomance standpoint, my simple > > > test now shows us outperforming mysql: > > > > Sweet ;-) > > I love this team. Kudos! So now it's MySQL users' turn to say, "Sure, but speed isn't everything...." :-) -- Michael Fuhr