X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (wm.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00AFD9FC0FF; Sat, 26 Aug 2006 12:04:54 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 34786-06; Sat, 26 Aug 2006 15:04:50 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from fetter.org (start.fetter.org [66.92.188.65]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8CD99FC0F9; Sat, 26 Aug 2006 12:04:49 -0300 (ADT) Received: by fetter.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 812D4F3D3CB; Sat, 26 Aug 2006 08:04:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 08:04:48 -0700 From: David Fetter To: Bruce Momjian Cc: PostgreSQL-development , PostgreSQL-documentation , Peter Eisentraut Subject: Re: [HACKERS] New XML section for documentation Message-ID: <20060826150448.GJ11427@fetter.org> References: <20060826002422.GF11427@fetter.org> <200608260037.k7Q0bJU26315@momjian.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200608260037.k7Q0bJU26315@momjian.us> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200608/48 X-Sequence-Number: 3666 On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 08:37:19PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > David Fetter wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 07:46:57PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > Here is an new XML section for our SGML documentation. It > > > explains the various XML capabilities, if we support them, and > > > how to use them. > > > > > > Comments? > > > > This looks hauntingly similar to Peter's presentation at the > > I used the XML/SQL and validation part from his talk, but the rest > was from earlier email discussions. Reuse is good :) > > conference. :) I'd add a http://wiscorp.com/SQLStandards.html to the > > This seems to be the best URL, but it seems too detailed: > > http://wiscorp.com/H2-2005-197-SC32N1293-WG3_Presentation_for_SC32_20050418.pdf I'd just put the http://wiscorp.com/SQLStandards.html URL in, as it contains several references in varying levels of detail. > > reference section. > > > > Speaking of other parts of the SQL:2003 standard, how about one > > section each that mentions them? There's > > > > Part 4: SQL/PSM (Persistent Stored Modules) > > Part 9: SQL/MED (Management of External Data) (my favorite) > > Part 10: SQL/OLB (Object Language Binding) > > Part 11: SQL/Schemata > > Part 13: SQL/JRT (Java Routines and Types) > > I don't know anything about them. We claim SQL standard compliance, so since those are part of SQL:2003, we probably ought to mention them. SQL/PSM is a programming language that lives inside the database, and DB2 and MySQL have it. SQL/MED lets people talk to other data stores. SQL/OLB appears to be derived from equel, which we have as ecpg. SQL/Schemata contains the information schema. SQL/JRT appears to bear some similarity to PL/Java and PL/J. Cheers, D -- David Fetter http://fetter.org/ phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Skype: davidfetter Remember to vote!