X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (wm.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BB279FC6C6 for ; Sun, 27 Aug 2006 16:39:23 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 15658-09 for ; Sun, 27 Aug 2006 19:39:16 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from eastrmmtao06.cox.net (eastrmmtao06.cox.net [68.230.240.33]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C44D59FC6C8 for ; Sun, 27 Aug 2006 16:39:15 -0300 (ADT) Received: from eastrmimpo02.cox.net ([68.1.16.120]) by eastrmmtao06.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20060827193914.FKPS16402.eastrmmtao06.cox.net@eastrmimpo02.cox.net>; Sun, 27 Aug 2006 15:39:14 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.8] ([68.226.0.201]) by eastrmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id F7fB1V0084LCPz00000000 Sun, 27 Aug 2006 15:39:11 -0400 From: Robert Treat To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Replication Documentation Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 15:39:08 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: Markus Schiltknecht , Peter Eisentraut , Chris Browne References: <44E9B95D.1030209@bluegap.ch> In-Reply-To: <44E9B95D.1030209@bluegap.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200608271539.09297.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.72 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=SARE_SPEC_REPLICA X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200608/63 X-Sequence-Number: 3681 On Monday 21 August 2006 09:47, Markus Schiltknecht wrote: > Hi, > > has there been a consensus about where a replication document should go > and what it should cover? > I think the general idea is to toss it on techdocs... like the GUI Tools page... http://www.postgresql.org/docs/techdocs.54 -- Robert Treat Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL