Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79AB09FB21A; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 13:03:09 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 90871-09; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 13:03:01 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from momjian.us (momjian.us [70.90.9.53]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9AC19FB1E1; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 13:03:00 -0300 (ADT) Received: (from bruce@localhost) by momjian.us (8.11.6/8.11.6) id k9PG2v329749; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 12:02:57 -0400 (EDT) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <200610251602.k9PG2v329749@momjian.us> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition In-Reply-To: <453F8A31.2090907@commandprompt.com> To: "Joshua D. Drake" Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 12:02:57 -0400 (EDT) CC: Tom Lane , Magnus Hagander , PostgreSQL-documentation , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL123] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.467 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL, SARE_SPEC_REPLICA, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200610/93 X-Sequence-Number: 3814 Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> "Magnus Hagander" writes: > >>> I think this is a good reason not to list *any* of the products by name > >>> in the documentation, but instead refer to a page on say techdocs that > >>> can be more easily updated. > >> I agree with that. If we have statements about other projects in our > >> docs, we will have a problem with not being able to update those > >> statements in a timely fashion when the other projects change. > > > > I mention only Slony and pgpool as examples of replication types. They > > seem to have risen to high enough visiblity to do that. I have not > > mentioned any other solutions. > > What about Slony-II or pgpool2? Which are fundamentally different from > their v1 counterparts (o.k. slony-ii isn't out yet but still). > > I +1 that we move to have all of the replication documentation pushed to > techdocs or other facility and just have a link from the docs. What I did was to mention Slony and pgpool as "examples", so people realize there are many other soluions. It would be good to have a companion web site that could list them all, both open source and commercial. That is going to take a lot more work, but I think would have great value, especially since our documentation will clearly outline the terms. What you don't want to do is to throw up a list and have people try to figure out what solutions they cover. -- Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +