Received: from localhost (wm.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE9979FA5B4; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 21:43:36 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29536-07; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 00:42:09 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from momjian.us (momjian.us [70.90.9.53]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D33079FB25E; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 21:42:08 -0300 (ADT) Received: (from bruce@localhost) by momjian.us (8.11.6/8.11.6) id k9Q0g7a03961; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 20:42:07 -0400 (EDT) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <200610260042.k9Q0g7a03961@momjian.us> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition In-Reply-To: <20061025234953.GB26892@nasby.net> To: "Jim C. Nasby" Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 20:42:07 -0400 (EDT) CC: Dawid Kuroczko , pgsql-docs@postgresql.org, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL123] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.719 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=SARE_SPEC_REPLICA, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200610/106 X-Sequence-Number: 3827 Jim C. Nasby wrote: > Something else worth doing though is to have a paragraph explaining why > there's no built-in replication. I don't have time to write something > right now, but I can do it later tonight if no one beats me to it. I thought that was implied in the early paragraph about why there are many solutions. -- Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +