Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 10:45:46 -0400
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Replication documentation addition
Message-ID: <20061026144546.GA5667@phlogiston.dyndns.org>
References: <200610251359.26336.josh@agliodbs.com>
	<200610252146.k9PLkYf12261@momjian.us>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200610252146.k9PLkYf12261@momjian.us>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i

On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 05:46:33PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
> > So, like www.postgresql.org/docs/techdocs/replication?   That would work.
> 
> Yes.

I like that idea, but I think that the URL needs to be decided upon,
needs to be stable, and needs to be put into the docs.  (I don't see
it ATM, I guess because the URL isn't chosen yet?)  We get so many
questions about "what replication system" that I'm sure people are
looking for outlines.

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan  | ajs@crankycanuck.ca
In the future this spectacle of the middle classes shocking the avant-
garde will probably become the textbook definition of Postmodernism. 
                --Brad Holland