From: Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Replication documentation addition
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 15:06:13 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1
Cc: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>
References: <200610251359.26336.josh@agliodbs.com>
	<200610252146.k9PLkYf12261@momjian.us>
	<20061026144546.GA5667@phlogiston.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <20061026144546.GA5667@phlogiston.dyndns.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200610261506.14079.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>

On Thursday 26 October 2006 10:45, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 05:46:33PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Josh Berkus wrote:
> > > So, like www.postgresql.org/docs/techdocs/replication?   That would
> > > work.
> >
> > Yes.
>
> I like that idea, but I think that the URL needs to be decided upon,
> needs to be stable, and needs to be put into the docs.  (I don't see
> it ATM, I guess because the URL isn't chosen yet?)  We get so many
> questions about "what replication system" that I'm sure people are
> looking for outlines.
>
> A

Unfortunately the techdocs system won't support a url like the one above, 
rather you'll end up with something more like the following  
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/techdocs.54 which is the "GUI Tools Guide" 
(which is linked in the FAQ fwiw).  Once it is in place, it will be stable 
though. 

-- 
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL