Received: from localhost (uranus.hub.org [200.46.204.60]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFD4D9FA38B for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:18:32 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.60]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 81925-02 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:18:30 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from momjian.us (momjian.us [70.90.9.53]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50B129FA3B3 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:18:30 -0400 (AST) Received: (from bruce@localhost) by momjian.us (8.11.6/8.11.6) id kAKMITh16596; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:18:29 -0500 (EST) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <200611202218.kAKMITh16596@momjian.us> Subject: Re: "Clustering" In-Reply-To: <200611202025.07234.peter_e@gmx.net> To: Peter Eisentraut Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:18:29 -0500 (EST) CC: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL123] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200611/48 X-Sequence-Number: 3882 Peter Eisentraut wrote: > The heading "Multi-Master Replication Using Clustering" doesn't make > sense to me. Clustering is bunching more than host together to achieve > a common goal. Thus multimaster replication may be a way to achieve > clustering, but clustering is not a way to achieve multimaster > replication. I don't actually see clustering defined in the > documentation. Can someone explain the categorization? I used the term clustering to mean that the servers work closely together. This is not as true with the other items on the page that are not clustering. > (FWIW, I think "Clustering For Parallel Query Execution" later in the > list is an appropriate use of the term.) Yes, I saw it as a similar issue. -- Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +