Received: from localhost (maia-4.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7C989FB8DF for ; Sun, 6 May 2007 13:44:57 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13182-08 for ; Sun, 6 May 2007 13:44:53 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from momjian.us (momjian.us [70.90.9.53]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB27A9FB8DE for ; Sun, 6 May 2007 13:44:52 -0300 (ADT) Received: (from bruce@localhost) by momjian.us (8.11.6/8.11.6) id l46Giof10226; Sun, 6 May 2007 12:44:50 -0400 (EDT) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <200705061644.l46Giof10226@momjian.us> Subject: Re: Documentation of pg_badkend_pid and stats functions In-Reply-To: <3CA672AD-CD9B-4DED-BCDB-026BAC4ED9D1@decibel.org> To: Jim Nasby Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 12:44:50 -0400 (EDT) CC: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL123] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200705/6 X-Sequence-Number: 4235 Jim Nasby wrote: > On Apr 12, 2007, at 7:54 AM, Jim Nasby wrote: > > Two questions: Why is pg_backend_pid documented with the stats > > functions (9.19 System Information Functions) seems more logical. > > > > Also, I can see mentioning the stats functions in the monitoring > > section, but shouldn't they actually be documented in with the rest > > of the functions? > > No comments? Does that mean if I write up a patch it'll be accepted? Yea, I was wondering about that. I think the best idea would be to reference the backend functions from the main functions page, rather than move them. -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +