Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 12:07:18 -0700
From: David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
To: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. Postgres labeling inconsistency
Message-ID: <20071005190718.GE6005@fetter.org>
References: <200710051922.01797.peter_e@gmx.net>
	<20071005182650.GD6005@fetter.org>
	<470685E1.6010501@commandprompt.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <470685E1.6010501@commandprompt.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12)

On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 11:43:45AM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> David Fetter wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 07:22:01PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> Some of you may have noticed that there was a move proposed to
> >> use "Postgres" alongside "PostgreSQL" as a product name in the
> >> documentation and other written resources.  A change along that
> >> line has already been made in the FAQ.
> >>
> 
> >> So I think what is being proposed is wrong and needs to be
> >> reverted.
> > 
> > That, or (my preference) make the change larger.  I think it's
> > significant that the vast majority of compatible software has some
> > variant of Postgres and *not* PostgreSQL in the name.
> 
> I have seen no evidence of this.

For evidence, take a look at the "Products" section of the Postgres
Weekly News.

Cheers,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 415 235 3778        AIM: dfetter666
                              Skype: davidfetter

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to PostgreSQL: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate