Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.182]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C89739FBA57 for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2007 16:21:58 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.182]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 05501-03 for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2007 16:21:46 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from fetter.org (start.fetter.org [66.92.188.65]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C68529FBA6E for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2007 16:21:53 -0300 (ADT) Received: by fetter.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 14515FBC99C; Fri, 5 Oct 2007 12:21:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 12:21:52 -0700 From: David Fetter To: "Joshua D. Drake" Cc: Peter Eisentraut , pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. Postgres labeling inconsistency Message-ID: <20071005192152.GF6005@fetter.org> References: <200710051922.01797.peter_e@gmx.net> <20071005182650.GD6005@fetter.org> <470685E1.6010501@commandprompt.com> <20071005190718.GE6005@fetter.org> <47068DD4.4080505@commandprompt.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47068DD4.4080505@commandprompt.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200710/8 X-Sequence-Number: 4429 On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 12:17:40PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > David Fetter wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 11:43:45AM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > >> Hash: SHA1 > >> > >> David Fetter wrote: > >>> On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 07:22:01PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > >>>> Some of you may have noticed that there was a move proposed to > >>>> use "Postgres" alongside "PostgreSQL" as a product name in the > >>>> documentation and other written resources. A change along that > >>>> line has already been made in the FAQ. > >>>> > >>>> So I think what is being proposed is wrong and needs to be > >>>> reverted. > >>> That, or (my preference) make the change larger. I think it's > >>> significant that the vast majority of compatible software has some > >>> variant of Postgres and *not* PostgreSQL in the name. > >> I have seen no evidence of this. > > > > For evidence, take a look at the "Products" section of the Postgres > > Weekly News. > > I just read through all products sections in the PostgreSQL weekly news > from 07-22-07 to 09-30-07. Nice job of careful cherry-picking, but I'm not buying it. Cheers, D -- David Fetter http://fetter.org/ phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Skype: davidfetter Remember to vote! Consider donating to PostgreSQL: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate