Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.187])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC2419F9A26
	for <pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Sat,  6 Oct 2007 22:13:50 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 94924-10 for <pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Sat,  6 Oct 2007 22:13:36 -0300 (ADT)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5
Received: from lists.commandprompt.com (host-254.commandprompt.net
	[207.173.203.254])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E1A39F9A16
	for <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>; Sat,  6 Oct 2007 22:13:42 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (201-220-98-36.bk9-dsl.surnet.cl
	[201.220.98.36]) (authenticated bits=0)
	by lists.commandprompt.com (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l971DisM026408;
	Sat, 6 Oct 2007 18:13:45 -0700
Received: by perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id BB08E47C6E; Sat,  6 Oct 2007 21:13:42 -0400 (CLT)
Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 21:13:42 -0400
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: incorrect HTML.index output
Message-ID: <20071007011342.GP7190@alvh.no-ip.org>
References: <20071006203602.GL7190@alvh.no-ip.org>
	<2316.1191719057@sss.pgh.pa.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2316.1191719057@sss.pgh.pa.us>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-11)
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.91.1/4482/Fri Oct 5 15:43:49 2007 on
	projects.commandprompt.com
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Greylist: Sender succeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by
	milter-greylist-1.6 (lists.commandprompt.com [192.168.2.159]);
	Sat, 06 Oct 2007 18:13:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Archive-Number: 200710/21
X-Sequence-Number: 4442

Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> > I just noticed that on bookindex.html, we have this entry:
> > &#960;, Mathematical Functions and Operators
> > ...
> > I'm unsure what to do about it.  To me, the simplest solution seems to
> > be to just remove the index entry.
> 
> Then it wouldn't be indexed at all.  I suggest just not trying to be
> so cute, and change the index entry like this:
> 
>     <indexterm>
> -    <primary>&pi;</primary>
> +    <primary>pi</primary>
>     </indexterm>

That seems simple enough :-)  Done.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                          Developer, http://www.PostgreSQL.org/
"Doing what he did amounts to sticking his fingers under the hood of the
implementation; if he gets his fingers burnt, it's his problem."  (Tom Lane)