Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.187]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 183979FA2AD for ; Mon, 8 Oct 2007 23:58:57 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 69716-06 for ; Mon, 8 Oct 2007 23:58:44 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from momjian.us (momjian.us [70.90.9.53]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFAE69FA2AB for ; Mon, 8 Oct 2007 23:58:50 -0300 (ADT) Received: (from bruce@localhost) by momjian.us (8.11.6/8.11.6) id l992wk802285; Mon, 8 Oct 2007 22:58:46 -0400 (EDT) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <200710090258.l992wk802285@momjian.us> Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. Postgres labeling inconsistency In-Reply-To: <200710061250.49408.peter_e@gmx.net> To: Peter Eisentraut Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 22:58:46 -0400 (EDT) CC: Markus Schiltknecht , pgsql-docs@postgresql.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL124 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200710/26 X-Sequence-Number: 4447 Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Markus Schiltknecht wrote: > > It's a compromise, a single step of a slow migration (which I still > > see as the only reasonable option). > > That assumes that there is somewhere to migrate to. But there isn't. > The renaming has been rejected. Amazing how you came to that conclusion, and I will not reargue that point here. -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +