Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.187]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37DC69FA18F for ; Fri, 19 Oct 2007 16:37:10 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 04272-01 for ; Fri, 19 Oct 2007 16:37:00 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from lists.commandprompt.com (host-254.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.254]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E16109FA11B for ; Fri, 19 Oct 2007 16:37:02 -0300 (ADT) Received: from perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (201-220-127-162.bk10-dsl.surnet.cl [201.220.127.162]) (authenticated bits=0) by lists.commandprompt.com (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l9JJakoM003981; Fri, 19 Oct 2007 12:36:47 -0700 Received: by perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E84B747C79; Fri, 19 Oct 2007 16:36:41 -0300 (CLST) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 16:36:41 -0300 From: Alvaro Herrera To: Steve Crawford Cc: Bruce Momjian , Tom Lane , pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Abbreviation list Message-ID: <20071019193641.GQ16000@alvh.no-ip.org> References: <200710190402.l9J42Wp11623@momjian.us> <4718F552.5080503@pinpointresearch.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4718F552.5080503@pinpointresearch.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-11) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.91.1/4545/Wed Oct 17 14:05:57 2007 on projects.commandprompt.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender succeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (lists.commandprompt.com [192.168.2.159]); Fri, 19 Oct 2007 12:36:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200710/997 X-Sequence-Number: 122289 Steve Crawford wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> Steve Crawford writes: > >>> My vote is to add "Appendix I. Abbreviations". > >> It seems more like FAQ material than something for the manual. > > > > I prefer the manual. I would think the list would be pretty long and > > deal with lots of internals terms. > > My vote too. Just noticed I missed (probably one of many): > BLOB - Binary Large Object Do we use that term? Normally for us it's "large objects". -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support