Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.187]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70D1B9FC871 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 13:15:51 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 58980-02 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 13:15:33 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from vms046pub.verizon.net (vms046pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.46]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C8F59F927E for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 13:15:38 -0300 (ADT) Received: from new-host.home ([71.179.23.138]) by vms046.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0JQH00BOK68UC0A0@vms046.mailsrvcs.net> for pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 11:10:08 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 12:10:02 -0400 From: Robert Treat Subject: Re: Pattern for use of the alias "Postgres" In-reply-to: <200710251532.l9PFWTW09836@momjian.us> To: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org Cc: Bruce Momjian Message-id: <200710251210.02905.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-disposition: inline References: <200710251532.l9PFWTW09836@momjian.us> User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200710/98 X-Sequence-Number: 12762 On Thursday 25 October 2007 11:32, Bruce Momjian wrote: > [ BCC to docs because this might affect documentation too.] > > You probably remember the discussion about promoting the use of the > alias "Postgres" in addition to the official name "PostgreSQL". I have > changed the FAQ so that in paragraphs with multiple references to > "PostgreSQL" we also use the alias "Postgres". > > I have talked about a similar change to our documentation and perhaps > the web site, but I am _not_ ready to discuss those. > > What I want to ask about is an idea a few people have mentioned. They > don't like that we change usage in the same paragraph. The suggestion > is to mention that "Postgres" is an alias to "PostgreSQL" at the top of > the document and just use "Postgres" in the remainder of the document. > > This seems like a lot more use of the alias than I though we wanted as a > group, but because several of the people suggesting this also didn't > want the alias at all, I figure I should ask and we can discuss it. > > So, for the FAQ, which currently uses the second-entry-per-paragraph > logic, should it be changed to the logic suggested above where every > mention but the first is "Postgres"? (This will of course affect the > documentation changes when we are ready to discuss those.) IMHO (and others as well, since this has been raised by others as well) this only makes are docs / faqs / etc... more confusing, and I think the use of both names scattered through is more confusing. We should strive to be consistent with our useage, whichever name we want to use. -- Robert Treat Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} Postgre