Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB3249F9E1E for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 18:38:03 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 62928-02 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 18:37:48 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 33B2D9F99A8 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 18:38:01 -0300 (ADT) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 25 Oct 2007 21:38:00 -0000 Received: from xdsl-87-79-139-203.netcologne.de (EHLO colt.pezone.net) [87.79.139.203] by mail.gmx.net (mp035) with SMTP; 25 Oct 2007 23:38:00 +0200 X-Authenticated: #495269 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+RACoU90WRbDymA1+UsdDQRpMqHYLo8LjPbst1k0 U/WB6COJ22De8U From: Peter Eisentraut To: Bruce Momjian Subject: Re: [DOCS] Pattern for use of the alias "Postgres" Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 23:37:57 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 Cc: Devrim =?iso-8859-1?q?G=DCND=DCZ?= , "pgsql-docs@postgresql.org" , "pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org" References: <200710252010.l9PKAVn20205@momjian.us> In-Reply-To: <200710252010.l9PKAVn20205@momjian.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200710252337.57881.peter_e@gmx.net> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200710/112 X-Sequence-Number: 12776 Bruce Momjian wrote: > Let's not get sidetracked here.  There was already agreement in > advocacy to promote the use of the alias, and this thread is to > discuss that, not to revisit whether we should use an alias or not. Advocacy opinions have no bearing on proper documentation writing. Nor do I believe that there was an actual agreement. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/