Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.191]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A06ED9FA637; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:24:31 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 67809-01; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:24:26 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from lists.commandprompt.com (host-254.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.254]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACB299FA5DC; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:24:26 -0300 (ADT) Received: from scratch (or-69-34-217-90.sta.embarqhsd.net [69.34.217.90]) (authenticated bits=0) by lists.commandprompt.com (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l9QKOSIY025338; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 13:24:28 -0700 Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 13:25:09 -0700 From: "Joshua D. Drake" To: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org Subject: First mention option for Postgres Message-ID: <20071026132509.288c6795@scratch> Organization: Joshua D. Drake X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.12.0; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/wbkUqfxziplFGEQAUCJLICh"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.91.1/4598/Thu Oct 25 23:52:26 2007 on projects.commandprompt.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender succeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (lists.commandprompt.com [192.168.2.159]); Fri, 26 Oct 2007 13:24:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200710/119 X-Sequence-Number: 12783 --Sig_/wbkUqfxziplFGEQAUCJLICh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, I am sure we are all long bored with this thread (on both sides) so I thought I would offer a compromise. When dealing with long documents it is quite common to see something like this: PostgreSQL hereafter referred to as Postgres I propose that we could have the FAQ and the Docs do the same thing. The very first mention in these documents will same something to the effect of: PostgreSQL hereafter referred to as Postgres, is the kick butt database of the planet and the dolphin that can't swim doesn't even compare. My proposal is not suggesting in *any* way that we change the following: The official project name, which is PostgreSQL The domain name of the project, which is postgresql.org Nor am I in anyway suggesting that we "promote" the name Postgres. We should instead continue our focus on promoting our project which is PostgreSQL and incorporates something much larger than just the database which is nicknamed Postgres. Bruce, would like this to happen for 8.3 Final. If he is willing to do the work required for the change, I see it as a reasonable compromise based on the various opinions of the community members. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake --=20 =3D=3D=3D The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. =3D=3D=3D Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ UNIQUE NOT NULL Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/ --Sig_/wbkUqfxziplFGEQAUCJLICh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHIk0nATb/zqfZUUQRApX3AJ9pTm32aMZHFWTfO8KHFymONllfdwCeLnuN mMsohM0DBEdK3uwUH1T09zM= =Nugj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/wbkUqfxziplFGEQAUCJLICh--