Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.182]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E648F9FCB71 for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2007 05:10:20 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.182]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02415-03 for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2007 05:10:05 -0400 (AST) Received: from gauss.credativ.com (gauss.credativ.com [212.112.227.254]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D5629FCB5B for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2007 05:10:19 -0400 (AST) Received: from hawking.credativ.lan (exit.credativ.com [87.139.82.80]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gauss.credativ.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE4267854C; Thu, 8 Nov 2007 10:10:16 +0100 (CET) From: Peter Eisentraut To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Mentioning Slony in docs Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 10:10:14 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 Cc: Simon Riggs References: <1194509440.4251.180.camel@ebony.site> In-Reply-To: <1194509440.4251.180.camel@ebony.site> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200711081010.14464.peter_e@gmx.net> X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200711/10 X-Sequence-Number: 4543 Am Donnerstag, 8. November 2007 schrieb Simon Riggs: > The main reason is that Slony is Copyrighted PGDG, so we own the code > and it is of course BSD licenced. Why is that a reason for mentioning it more prominently? Is "code ownership" a relevant property? -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/