Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.182]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 072D39FCB7A for ; Sun, 11 Nov 2007 03:02:54 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.182]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 54520-02 for ; Sun, 11 Nov 2007 03:02:46 -0400 (AST) Received: from momjian.us (momjian.us [70.90.9.53]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 717999FCBAD for ; Sun, 11 Nov 2007 01:14:58 -0400 (AST) Received: (from bruce@localhost) by momjian.us (8.11.6/8.11.6) id lAB5ExN19424; Sun, 11 Nov 2007 00:14:59 -0500 (EST) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <200711110514.lAB5ExN19424@momjian.us> Subject: Re: Placement of contrib modules in SGML documentation In-Reply-To: <11765.1194756539@sss.pgh.pa.us> To: Tom Lane Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 00:14:59 -0500 (EST) CC: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL124 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200711/25 X-Sequence-Number: 4558 Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > >> BTW, why are neither contrib/dblink nor contrib/spi included in the > >> conversion? > > > I see dblink: > > http://momjian.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/dblink.html > > Oh, in that case the question is why the contrib/db/doc/ files are > still there. Because I thought only READMEs were converted. Removed now. > > I assume spi wasn't done because it is just examples of SPI usage. > > The .example files are fine, but what about the two README files? My guess is they were not converted because they are READMEs that related to the examples. We can convert them if people want. -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +