Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.182]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59D6E9F99D8 for ; Sun, 11 Nov 2007 09:11:44 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.182]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25624-09 for ; Sun, 11 Nov 2007 09:11:34 -0400 (AST) Received: from k2smtpout05-01.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (k2smtpout05-01.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net [64.202.189.56]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AA06A9FA365 for ; Sun, 11 Nov 2007 09:11:38 -0400 (AST) Received: (qmail 29412 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2007 13:11:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.cowdot.com) (208.109.83.21) by k2smtpout05-01.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.189.56) with ESMTP; 11 Nov 2007 13:11:36 -0000 Received: by mail.cowdot.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id C63552A888A; Sun, 11 Nov 2007 06:10:50 -0700 (MST) Received: from albert.local (111.pool85-52-225.static.orange.es [85.52.225.111]) by mail.cowdot.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CF2C2A8880 for ; Sun, 11 Nov 2007 06:10:22 -0700 (MST) From: Albert Cervera i Areny Organization: NaN To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Placement of contrib modules in SGML documentation Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 14:10:27 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <11603.1194755816@sss.pgh.pa.us> In-Reply-To: <11603.1194755816@sss.pgh.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200711111410.27946.albert@nan-tic.com> X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200711/26 X-Sequence-Number: 4559 A Diumenge 11 Novembre 2007, Tom Lane va escriure: > I think there's a case for putting these pages under Part V Server > Programming (though a few are not in fact server-side code), or under > Part VI Reference (ignoring the fact that most of the text isn't in a > uniform reference-page style ... though maybe we could plan to work > towards that) or under Appendixes (though I'm sure there are people > who will complain about that because their private agenda is to make > these things as prominent as possible). Or we could make them a new > top-level Part, probably just after Reference. > That's where I put them initialy AFAIR but somebody complained they should be in the Reference. Maybe if we now agree that's not the appropiate place we can move them to a new Part. -- Albert Cervera i Areny http://www.NaN-tic.com